![]() ![]() In my opinion, that's a feat's worth alright. A feat from a limited list plus, in the case of a Vanilla fighter, the ability to move full-speed in medium armor. In the given example of Fighter2/Barbarian 1 with the feat you pay a General feat (slot) to gain. Changing it to at least 3rd or at least 6th character level would probably tone it down.Īgain - you're looking at numbers, but what else? It barely makes dipping out bearable AND it costs a feat. The feat is, I admit, probably a bit over the top, though I still can't see a specific situation where that level+1 would be gamebreaking. Stronger than Magical Knack, but doesn't apply to the strongest thing in the game, which is spellcasting. The trait, I think, is on par with some of the things () spellcasters () get (), since it's basically a one-level multiclass rectifier. While I see this may appear powerful, I have thoroughly looke through Paizo and DSP classes before settling on the final form of the feat and trait. That level of difference matters mostly on low levels, since it doesn't inherently grant pwerful abilities. It would be better if this just treated your level in regards to class abilities you already have as +2 levels higher (max of character level +1).ĭiligent Student basically does the same thing, but as a trait! Traits aren't supposed to be powerful at all, their flavor abilities that happen to provide a minor benefit.Īgain, I haven't seen a class where it would break it. Sure, you don't get the BaB, save, skills, or spellcasting of the level, but you're gaining new abilities an entire level before you should. You're basically handing out a level at the cost of just a feat. ![]() I haven't seen a class where that would break it. Wait, so this basically means that you have all the class traits one level earlier than you ought to, right?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |